Effect of ISO Settings on Image Quality
Lately, I have been talking about the Exposure Triangle, and how you need to understand what it is all about to take creative control over your picture making.
In this post I figured I’d demonstrate one of the points of that imaginary triangle - the ISO setting.
Remember what the three points were?
Aperture - size of the light opening into the camera
Shutter Speed - how long time the shutter stays open
ISO Setting - sensitivity setting of the light-recording camera sensor
You may recall that I have told you the image quality gets impaired if you crank up the ISO-setting. OK, now I am going to show it to you, according to the old adage, “One picture is worth 1000 words.”
See the pictures above? Both are shot at the same aperture, but with different ISO-settings. For the one on the left I set my old Canon Powershot digicam at 50 ISO, and right after snapping that picture I changed to 400 ISO and snapped the picture to the right.
Well, in fact both of these are enlarged details of the original pictures; here below you can see what the original pictures looked like (I show the 50 ISO one here, the other looks just about the same).
The enlarged details show very clearly how the image quality gets degraded at high ISO-settings (400 ISO was the highest I could get with my camera, more advanced digicams allow for much higher ISO numbers). The difference is especially evident on perfectly smooth and uniform surfaces, like on cars.
Note how the surface looks quite grainy at 400 ISO.
– Hmmm, I wonder where they use such funny license plates on cars…?
The ISO scale is set so that each doubling of the numbers equals doubling the sensitivity; like ISO 400 is twice as sensitive a setting as ISO 200, which is twice as sensitive as ISO 100 - and so on. In other words, by sacrificing some of the image clarity I have made the camera sensor EIGHT TIMES more sensitive to light!
In low-light situations, this could mean the difference between getting a useable picture or not, like being able to shoot at 1/40 of a second rather than 1/5 - in the latter case it would be very difficult to avoid blur due to camera movement.
You may wonder how this image noise happens? Well, you probably know that a digital image is composed of an array of tiny squares called “pixels“. Each pixel can have its own color, thus forming a mosaic that builds up the total picture. Now imagine there is a tiny goblin sitting at each pixel, with the duty of trying to figure out the nature of the brief light pulse that arrives at that pixel when the picture is snapped.
At low ISO settings the goblin doesn’t need to make up its mind until there is enough light to make a good decision. But if you crank up the ISO-setting, each goblin is forced to decide based on very scanty data - more or less make an educated guess. And therefore the final image will be a bit of a guesswork.
Even if you don’t believe in goblins I’m sure you can follow my reasoning. So what have we learned today? Something like this maybe:
If all else fails, we can crank up the ISO-setting of a digital camera to get a picture where it otherwise wouldn’t have been possible.
In other words: avoid upping the ISO number unless it is really needed - or you don’t really care about the image quality. Note: you can set the ISO value on automatic on probably just about any digicam. If you do, make sure you know what is going on to avoid surprises. The camera may have a low opinion of your ability to hold it steady at slow shutter speeds.
Update: I should mention that advanced users may be interested in testing post-processing software which reduces such image noise as you get at high ISO-settings. Since I haven’t tested these myself I don’t know how good they are at improving the quality of such images, but I’ve seen that some swear by them.








